Soi 71
A FindMeGlutenFree listing reports a gluten-free menu and that the kitchen recently switched to only GF soy sauce, but the same listing explicitly states the venue is not a dedicated GF facility and may not be safe for coeliac disease. One reviewer with coeliac reports contamination on two recent visits. The venue is also listed as permanently closed on that aggregator. TripAdvisor tags the venue as having 'Gluten free options' but provides no kitchen details. Overall, the signal is thin and contradictory; call ahead to confirm current status and practices.
Per-allergen evidence
Coeliac · Gluten-free
confidence 35% ·
Limited information, Thin positive signal only: a stray menu callout, a single passing review mention, or generic dietary marketing without specifics. Not enough to assess kitchen practice. Call ahead and confirm before relying on it.
A FindMeGlutenFree listing reports a gluten-free menu and that the kitchen recently switched to only GF soy sauce, but the same listing explicitly states the venue is not a dedicated GF facility and may not be safe for coeliac disease. One reviewer with coeliac reports contamination on two recent visits. The venue is also listed as permanently closed on that aggregator. TripAdvisor tags the venue as having 'Gluten free options' but provides no kitchen details. Overall, the signal is thin and contradictory; call ahead to confirm current status and practices.
Honest caveat: A coeliac reviewer reports getting contaminated on their last two visits.
Cited references
Vegan
confidence 30% ·
Limited information, Thin positive signal only: a stray menu callout, a single passing review mention, or generic dietary marketing without specifics. Not enough to assess kitchen practice. Call ahead and confirm before relying on it.
TripAdvisor tags the venue as having 'Vegan options', but no further details about kitchen practice, dedicated equipment, or staff training are available from any source. The signal is too thin to assess safety for strict vegans.
Vegetarian
confidence 30% ·
Limited information, Thin positive signal only: a stray menu callout, a single passing review mention, or generic dietary marketing without specifics. Not enough to assess kitchen practice. Call ahead and confirm before relying on it.
TripAdvisor tags the venue as 'Vegetarian friendly', but no further details about kitchen practice, dedicated equipment, or staff training are available from any source. The signal is too thin to assess safety for strict vegetarians.
Shellfish-free
confidence 25% ·
Limited information, Thin positive signal only: a stray menu callout, a single passing review mention, or generic dietary marketing without specifics. Not enough to assess kitchen practice. Call ahead and confirm before relying on it.
A foodpanda user review mentions that many appetisers contain prawn, and the reviewer notes they are allergic to shellfish, but the venue itself provides no allergen labeling or kitchen practice information. The signal is too thin to assess safety for shellfish allergy.
Reminder
Always confirm with venue staff before ordering. Tiers and accreditations are guides, not guarantees.
Read the methodology →