Amaru

confidence 0.50 ·

Marked menu, shared, Allergen-marked menu and aware staff but shared fryer / prep. Cross-contamination risk acknowledged.

The AGFG listing includes a 'Vegetarian Options' category tag, suggesting vegetarian dishes are available. However, no details on dedicated prep, marked menu, or staff training are provided. The website does not mention vegetarian accommodations. Given the fine-dining tasting menu format, vegetarian options are likely available on request but with shared kitchen, so Tier D (marked menu, shared) is a reasonable estimate with low confidence.

confidence 0.55 ·

Available on request, No marked menu but staff will accommodate. Quality varies by who is working that shift.

The venue's website states dietary requirements can be accommodated with prior notice, and the AGFG listing includes a 'Gluten Free Options' category tag. No dedicated kitchen, dedicated fryer, or marked menu is mentioned. A single review on FindMeGlutenFree for a different Amaru location (Chicago) reports knowledgeable staff and a 'celiac' order marking system, but that is not this venue. For the Melbourne restaurant, the evidence is limited to a generic accommodation policy, placing it at Tier E (available on request).

confidence 0.90 ·

Not appropriate, Documented unsafe, multiple negative reports, or refuses to accommodate. Surfaced to warn rather than recommend.

The venue's website explicitly states: 'Unfortunately we cannot cater for vegan diners.' This is a clear refusal to accommodate, placing it at Tier F (not appropriate).