
La Bottega Enoteca
The venue says it cannot cater to life-threatening allergies and asks diners with other intolerances to email ahead. No nut-specific policy is mentioned, but the general refusal for serious allergies suggests risk for nut-allergic diners.
Per-allergen evidence
Nut-free
confidence 40% ·
Limited information, Thin positive signal only: a stray menu callout, a single passing review mention, or generic dietary marketing without specifics. Not enough to assess kitchen practice. Call ahead and confirm before relying on it.
The venue says it cannot cater to life-threatening allergies and asks diners with other intolerances to email ahead. No nut-specific policy is mentioned, but the general refusal for serious allergies suggests risk for nut-allergic diners.
Honest caveat: Venue states it cannot cater to life-threatening allergies.
Shellfish-free
confidence 40% ·
Limited information, Thin positive signal only: a stray menu callout, a single passing review mention, or generic dietary marketing without specifics. Not enough to assess kitchen practice. Call ahead and confirm before relying on it.
The venue says it cannot cater to life-threatening allergies and asks diners with other intolerances to email ahead. No shellfish-specific policy is mentioned, but the general refusal for serious allergies suggests risk for shellfish-allergic diners.
Honest caveat: Venue states it cannot cater to life-threatening allergies.
Coeliac · Gluten-free
confidence 70% ·
Not recommended, Documented unsafe for this allergen: refuses to accommodate, multiple bad reports, or a documented incident. Surfaced as a warning rather than a recommendation.
The venue's own booking policy states it is 'unable to accommodate gluten-free requests' and 'unable to cater to life-threatening allergies', because gluten is 'fundamental to our cuisine'. The kitchen does not offer safe alternatives and cross-contamination is expected.
Honest caveat: Venue explicitly refuses gluten-free requests in its booking terms.
Vegan
confidence 70% ·
Not recommended, Documented unsafe for this allergen: refuses to accommodate, multiple bad reports, or a documented incident. Surfaced as a warning rather than a recommendation.
The venue's booking terms state it is 'unable to accommodate vegan' requests, describing dairy and gluten as fundamental to its cuisine. No vegan options are offered and the kitchen is not set up to serve them safely.
Honest caveat: Venue explicitly refuses vegan requests in its booking terms.
Dairy-free
confidence 70% ·
Not recommended, Documented unsafe for this allergen: refuses to accommodate, multiple bad reports, or a documented incident. Surfaced as a warning rather than a recommendation.
The venue's booking terms state it is 'unable to accommodate dairy-free requests', because dairy is 'fundamental to our cuisine'. No safe alternatives are available and cross-contamination is likely.
Honest caveat: Venue explicitly refuses dairy-free requests in its booking terms.
Reminder
Always confirm with venue staff before ordering. Tiers and accreditations are guides, not guarantees.
Read the methodology →